These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Polyomavirus BK nephropathy in renal transplant: 2 cases with different clinical expressions and review of the literature].
    Author: Bonofiglio R, Papalia T, Caroleo MC, Mazzucco G, Merlino C, Bergallo M, Giraldi C, Perugini D, De Stefano R, Iuele R, De Napoli N.
    Journal: G Ital Nefrol; 2003; 20(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 12647285.
    Abstract:
    INTRODUCTION: Polyomavirus BK nephropathy is emerging as a significant cause of interstitial nephritis and allograft dysfunction (1-2). CASE REPORT: Two patients with renal transplants from cadaveric kidneys were treated with Tacrolimus plus Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) and Cyclosporine plus MMF, respectively. Their renal function gradually deteriorated eight to twelve months after the transplant. The renal biopsy of the first patient showed signs of significant interstitial tubulite, which necessitated the anti-rejection therapy with intravenous steroid pulses. After the pulses there was an additional dramatic increase in plasmatic creatinine, which suggested a revaluation of the kidney biopsy because of suspected Polyomavirus BK (BKV) nephropathy. In fact, after a more careful review, the suspicion of BKV infection was confirmed by the presence of intranuclear inclusions of tubular epithelium cells and marked denudation of the tubular basal membrane. The subsequent screening in both cases confirmed the presence of decoy cells in the urine, while the immunohistochemical analysis of the renal biopsy was strongly positive for the SV40 antigen. Our diagnosis was that of interstitial nephritis due to Polyomavirus BK that, in the first patient, was expressed by more aggressive clinical progress, probably due to enhanced immunosuppression from incorrect diagnosis of the interstitial rejection. The pre-transplant clinical outcome of the first patient was characterised by proteinuric nephropathy without any histological confirmation. Furthermore, we observed abundant pre-transplant residual diuresis and glucose intolerance. All these elements led us to hypothesise that native kidneys could have a fundamental role as viral reservoirs. CONCLUSION: Even though we reconfirm the decisive role of the immunosuppressive therapy and of the donor s kidney as the fundamental causes of Polyomavirus reactivation, we believe that it cannot be the result of a possible active role by the native kidney. In fact, as already noted, the SV40 genome is important in the pathogenesis of focal gomerulosclerosis. Furthermore, reports of polyoma nephropathy in not-yet-transplanted patients could accredit the role of the native kidneys as important viral reservoirs capable of inducing nephropathy in renal transplant patients.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]