These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Clearance of middle ear effusions and middle ear pressures.
    Author: Sadé J, Halevy A, Hadas E.
    Journal: Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1976; 85(2 Suppl 25 Pt 2):58-62. PubMed ID: 1267369.
    Abstract:
    Twenty-six children presenting bilateral secretory otitis media (SOM) had ventilating tubes inserted into both middle ears. Mucus was, however, aspirated only from one ear, the right side. The vast majority of ears right and left were seen to have cleared their effusion equally well regardless of whether they were aspirated on not. This experiment points toward the essential intactness of the mucociliary system and the patency of the lumen of the Eustachian tube in SOM. Promotion of middle ear clearance through ventilation, which reminds one of the second opening in a beer can, does obviously suggest the relief of some negative pressure. Direct manometric measurements of SOM middle pressure were performed in 41 ears showing negative pressure averaging --1.7 mm H2O, this range being two orders of magnitude less than tympanometric measurements. Normal ears did not have even such a small negative pressure. The validity of these direct manometric measurements was checked against a model of the middle ear. Tympanometry, which is a valid diagnostic tool, does indicate in all probability the presence of middle ear effusion due to its rheologic effects on the drum and ossicles rather than the measure of actual middle ear pressures. This is determined by the fact that direct needling of the middle ear, or even the insertion of a ventilating tube, did not change tympanometric values but aspiration of part of the effusion did: indeed the latter tended to bring manometry to normal values.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]