These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Combined palmar and dorsal approach for complex distal radius fractures].
    Author: Espen D.
    Journal: Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2003 Jan; 35(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 12772060.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper was to describe our management of complex fractures of the distal radius using a combined dorsal and palmar approach and to evaluate the radiological and clinical outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty out of 26 patients with complex fractures of the distal radius, which were operated on from 1996 to 2000 using a combined dorsal and palmar approach, were followed-up on an average of 28 months. According to AO fracture classification, there were one A3, two B3, three C1, two C2 and twelve C3 fractures. Six patients had associated injuries. The treatment was standardized: closed reduction on the day of injury; depending on the soft-tissue situation an external fixator or a forearm splint was applied; every patient underwent a computed tomography before the definitive surgical procedure, which was performed between one and 28 days after the injury when the swelling had subsided. According to the fracture patterns, the distal radius was stabilized using double plates (3), a palmar plate (11) or a dorsal plate (4), screws (1) or K-wires (1) combined with the initially applied external fixator (6). Follow-up included a radiological and clinical examination. The results were graded with use of the modified Mayo Wrist Score. Disability was assessed using the DASH score. RESULTS: All fractures healed, some with minor malunion. Fourteen of the 20 patients had osteoarthrotic changes. Compared to the opposite wrist, range of motion for flexion/extension was reduced by 25 %, radial/ulnar deviation by 20 % and forearm rotation by 5 %. Grip strength averaged 15 % less than that of the opposite side. Modified Mayo Wrist Score revealed 65 % excellent, 30 % good and 5 % poor results. DASH score averaged 18 points.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]