These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Pharmacodynamic activity of azithromycin against macrolide-susceptible and -resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae simulating clinically achievable free serum, epithelial lining fluid and middle ear fluid concentrations.
    Author: Zhanel GG, DeCorby M, Noreddin A, Mendoza C, Cumming A, Nichol K, Wierzbowski A, Hoban DJ.
    Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother; 2003 Jul; 52(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 12775677.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: The association between macrolide resistance mechanisms and bacteriological eradication of Streptococcus pneumoniae remains poorly studied. The present study, using an in vitro pharmacodynamic model, assessed azithromycin activity against macrolide-susceptible and -resistant S. pneumoniae simulating clinically achievable free serum (S), epithelial lining fluid (ELF) and middle ear fluid (MEF) concentrations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two macrolide-susceptible [PCR-negative for both mef(A) and erm(B)] and six macrolide-resistant [five mef(A)-positive/erm(B)-negative displaying various degrees of macrolide resistance and one mef(A)-negative/erm(B)-positive] S. pneumoniae were tested. Azithromycin was modelled simulating a dosage of 500 mg/250 mg by mouth, once a day [free S: maximum concentration (Cmax) 0.2 mg/L, t1/2 68 h; free ELF Cmax 1.0 mg/L, t1/2 68 h] and 10 mg/kg by mouth, once a day (free MEF: Cmax 1.0 mg/L, t1/2 68 h) using a one compartment model. Starting inocula were 1 x 10(6) cfu/mL in Mueller-Hinton broth with 2% lysed horse blood. Sampling at 0, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h assessed the extent of bacterial killing (decrease in log10 cfu/mL versus initial inoculum). RESULTS: Free azithromycin concentrations in serum, ELF and MEF simulating time above the MIC (T > MIC) of 100% [area under the curve to MIC (AUC0-24/MIC] > or = 36.7] were bactericidal (> or = 3 log10 killing) at 24 and 48 h versus macrolide-susceptible S. pneumoniae. Against macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae, free serum concentrations providing T > MIC of 0% or AUC0-24/MIC < or = 1.1 demonstrated no bacterial inhibition followed by regrowth at 24 and 48 h, whereas free ELF and MEF providing T > MIC of 0% or AUC0-24/MIC of 4.6 produced a bacteriostatic (0.2-0.5 log10 killing at 24 h) effect with a mef(A) strain with an azithromycin MIC of 2 mg/L. Against mef(A)-positive S. pneumoniae strains with azithromycin MICs > or = 4 mg/L, no bacterial killing occurred at any time point and rapid regrowth was observed simulating ELF or MEF T > MIC of 0% or AUC0-24/MIC < or = 2.3. CONCLUSION: Azithromycin serum, ELF and MEF concentrations rapidly eradicated macrolide-susceptible S. pneumoniae but did not eradicate macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae regardless of resistance phenotype.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]