These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Time spent at VO2max: a methodological issue.
    Author: Dupont G, Blondel N, Berthoin S.
    Journal: Int J Sports Med; 2003 May; 24(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 12784172.
    Abstract:
    This study was designed to propose a standardised procedure to determine the time spent at VO2max (tVO2max) based on the VO2max of the day (i. e. the VO2max value measured the day of the test). Ten male subjects first performed a graded field test, followed by a continuous running exercise to exhaustion, at the velocity of the Université de Montréal Track Test (V(UMTT)) plus 1 km x h(-1) (V(UMTT)(+1)). The second test consisted of an exhaustive run at 100 % of V(UMTT), followed by a V(UMTT)(+1) test. Different methods were used to compare time spent at VO2max, based on the VO2max of the graded field test, and time spent at VO2max, based on the VO2max of the day, during an exhaustive run at 100 % of V(UMTT). Results have shown that V(UMTT)(+1) tests were of sufficient intensity and duration to identify the VO2max of the day. Time spent at VO2max ranged from 25 +/- 53 s to 139 +/- 76 s according to the method used. However, the tVO2max method based on the sum of each value higher than 95 % of VO2max of the day appeared more robust than methods based on the time to exhaustion minus time to reach VO2 reference value, or the method based on the sum of values higher than VO2max minus 2.1 ml x kg(-1) x min(-1).
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]