These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The effects of different donor cells and passages on development of reconstructed embryos.
    Author: Lei L, Liu ZH, Wang H, Kou ZH, Wu YQ, Xu Y, Cheng Y, Zhu ZY, Xia GL, Chen DY.
    Journal: Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2003 Mar; 30(3):215-20. PubMed ID: 12812086.
    Abstract:
    In order to study the effects of different donor cells and passages on development of nuclear transfer embryos, we constructed embryos by electrofusing several kinds of donor cells into enucleated M II oocytes from Kun Ming (KM) mouse. These cells include 2-cell embryonic blastomeres, KMW embryonic stem (ES) cells, fetal fibroblast, ear fibroblast, tail tip fibroblast, sertoil cells and spermatogonia. Meanwhile, we compared the effects of passage numbers of fetal fibroblast cells on developmental competency after nuclear transfer. We found that 7.4% of reconstructed embryos from 2-cell embryonic blastomeres and 0.7% from ES cell could develop to blastocyst in vitro; embryos from fetal fibroblast could only develop to morula stage with the rate of 0.2%; embryos from spermatogonia could only develop to 8-cell stage and the rate was 0.3%; embryos respectively from ear fibroblast, sertoli cell and tail tip fibroblast could only develop to 4-cell stage. Although 2-cell development rate of embryos reconstructed from fetal fibroblast in first passage was significantly lower than those from the 2nd, the 3rd and the 4th passage, embryos from different passages could develop to 8-cell stage except the 3rd passage. The result indicated that it is more difficult for terminally differentiated cell nuclei to be reprogrammed in enucleated M II oocytes than for low differentiated cell nuclei. The reason of low development rate from ES cells maybe that most of ES cells was at S stage of the cell cycle, which out of coordination with M II oocytes. We could conclude that culture and passage of donor cells might be benefit to nucleus reprogramming.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]