These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The clinical toxicology of chlordecone as an example of toxicological risk assessment for man.
    Author: Guzelian PS.
    Journal: Toxicol Lett; 1992 Dec; 64-65 Spec No():589-96. PubMed ID: 1281940.
    Abstract:
    Safety assessment procedures still rely heavily if not exclusively on the results of tests carried out in laboratory animals, then extrapolated to man. There are few examples of environmental compounds examined extensively enough in both man and animals to permit a critical comparison of the accuracy of such risk assessment procedures. Chlordecone (Kepone) is a lipophilic, rodent liver carcinogen which now stands among the most extensively studied environmental agents in humans. More than five years of clinical investigations of workers heavily exposed to organochlorine pesticide have established the spectrum of human toxicity of Chlordecone, its dose-response relationships, tissue distribution, metabolic pathways, half-time for elimination, and the concentration at which its major toxic manifestations involving the central nervous system, the liver, and the testes are not observed (no observable effect level, NOEL). Taking advantage of this unique opportunity to proximately compare humans with experimental animals for a single compound administered at comparable doses, we find that none of the toxic effects produced in humans were unrepresented in animal testing. However, the animal testing produced numerous "false positive" results. Hence, accurately predicting the qualitative toxicity of chlordecone in man based on studies in rats would have been impossible. Indeed, proteinuria observed in rats fed small amounts of chlordecone for two years was chosen as a sensitive endpoint by the United States Environmental Protection Agency as the basis for establishing acceptable levels of human exposure. However, we never observed proteinuria even in humans whose dose of chlordecone was hundreds of times higher than that given to the rats. We conclude that greater emphasis should be placed on clinical investigation of humans exposed to environmental agents. A better understanding of the strength and also of the limitations of animal toxicity testing will improve the reliability of extrapolating results of animal testing to human exposure conditions.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]