These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Comparative study of antibody identification in the gel centrifugation test (ID Microtyping System), solid phase antiglobulin test (Solidscreen Capture R, Ready ID) and tube test].
    Author: Hitzler W, Johanson C, Schömig-Brekner J, Mathias D.
    Journal: Beitr Infusionsther; 1992; 30():370-4. PubMed ID: 1284737.
    Abstract:
    The gel centrifugation test (ID Microtyping System)--a new method for antibody screening--was compared with solid phase systems (Solidscreen, Capture R, Ready ID) and the conventional tube test. 141 different antibodies were tested and the results were compared. The ID Microtyping System identified 138 (98%) of all antibodies, the tube test 110 (78%), Capture R 86 (61%), Ready ID 79 (56%) and Solidscreen 75 (53%). The results in identification of all antibodies except cold agglutinins (n = 107) were: in the ID Microtyping System 98% (105), tube test 76% (82), Capture R 70% (75), Ready ID 68% (73) and Solidscreen 61% (65).
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]