These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Positive end-expiratory pressure delays the progression of lung injury during ventilator strategies involving high airway pressure and lung overdistention.
    Author: Valenza F, Guglielmi M, Irace M, Porro GA, Sibilla S, Gattinoni L.
    Journal: Crit Care Med; 2003 Jul; 31(7):1993-8. PubMed ID: 12847394.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: Many studies have investigated the protective role of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on ventilator-induced lung injury. Most assessed lung injury in protocols involving different ventilation strategies applied for the same length of time. This study, however, set out to investigate the protective role of PEEP with respect to the time needed to reach similar levels of lung injury. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized laboratory animal investigation. SETTING: The University Laboratory of Ospedale Maggiore, Milano, IRCCS. SUBJECTS: Anesthetized, paralyzed, and mechanically ventilated Sprague-Dawley rats. INTERVENTIONS: Three groups of five Sprague-Dawley rats were ventilated using zero end-expiratory pressure ZEEP (PEEP of 0 cm H(2)O) and PEEP of 3 and 6 cm H(2)O and a similar index of lung overdistension (Paw(p)/P(100) congruent with 1.1; where Paw(p) is peak airway pressure and P(100) is the pressure corresponding to total lung capacity). To obtain this, tidal volume was reduced depending on the PEEP. To reach similar levels of lung injury, we measured respiratory system elastance while ventilating the animals and killed them when respiratory system elastance was 150% of baseline. Once target respiratory system elastance was reached, the lung wet-to-dry ratio was obtained. RESULTS: Rats were ventilated with comparable high airway pressure (Paw(p) of 42.8 +/- 3.1, 43.5 +/- 2.6, and 46.2 +/- 4.4, respectively, for PEEP 0, 3, and 6) obtaining similar overdistension (Paw(p)/P(100) - index of overdistension: 1.17 +/- 0.2, 1.06 +/- 0.1, and 1.19 +/- 0.2). The respiratory system elastance target was reached and wet-to-dry ratio was not different in the three groups, suggesting a similar degree of lung damage. The time taken to achieve the target respiratory system elastance was three times longer with PEEP 3 and 6 (55 +/- 14 mins and 60 +/- 17) as compared with zero end-expiratory pressure (18 +/- 3 mins, p <.001). CONCLUSION: These findings confirm that PEEP is protective against ventilator-induced lung injury and may enable the clinician to "buy time" in the progression of lung injury.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]