These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Chronic exposure to NMDA receptor and sodium channel blockers during development in monkeys and rats: long-term effects on cognitive function.
    Author: Paule MG, Fogle CM, Allen RR, Pearson EC, Hammond TG, Popke EJ.
    Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2003 May; 993():116-22; discussion 123-4. PubMed ID: 12853303.
    Abstract:
    The effects of chronic administration of MK-801 (NMDA-receptor antagonist) and remacemide (sodium channel blocker) on monkey learning of several brain function tasks was assessed in juveniles (nine months old). Low (LO) and high (HI) doses of both drugs were given orally each day for 18 months. There were no adverse effects of any treatment on tests of short-term memory or motivation. HI doses of both MK-801 and remacemide delayed acquisition of a visual discrimination task (the remacemide effect was much greater). HI doses of remacemide alone severely disrupted learning task acquisition and this effect lasted for several months after dosing. Thus, in monkeys, chronic blockade of NMDA receptors is relatively well tolerated, whereas blockade of sodium channels (perhaps in conjunction with NMDA receptor blockade) has long-term-perhaps permanent-consequences. To further explore the roles of NMDA receptors and sodium channels in these effects, MK-801, phenytoin (sodium channel blocker), or both were administered to rats and the acquisition of tasks similar to those used in the monkey study were assessed. Dosing began at weaning and continued for nine months. Throughout the study, HI MK-801 subjects exhibited impaired performance in all tasks. Some effects of MK-801 were blocked completely by phenytoin. In the rat, blockade of sodium channels was well tolerated but blockade of NMDA receptors had significant and long-term (permanent?) adverse consequences. These data contrast markedly with those obtained for the monkey and suggest, at least for some drug classes, that the rat might not be a good predictor of effects in primates.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]