These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Reliability of a combined 3-min constant load and performance cycling test. Author: Doherty M, Balmer J, Davison RC, Robinson L, Smith PM. Journal: Int J Sports Med; 2003 Jul; 24(5):366-71. PubMed ID: 12868049. Abstract: Most fitness assessments either use a constant load to exhaustion (exercise capacity test) or an "all-out" effort (performance test). The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of a high-intensity assessment that combined a constant load element with a performance test. Ten moderately trained male cyclists completed a ramp test to voluntary exhaustion in order to measure maximum minute power output (mean +/- s, 349.3 w +/- 55.0 w). On two other occasions subjects cycled at a constant load at maximum minute power output for 2-min immediately followed by a 1-min performance test. All tests were conducted on the subjects' own bicycles using a Kingcycle trade mark test rig. Power output was measured each second using SRM trade mark Power Cranks. The data were analysed by measuring the reliability of each 30 s of the 3-min test together with the peak power and the peak cadence achieved in the performance element of the test. There was no systematic bias in the data from trial 1 to trial 2 for any of the 6, 30 s blocks of the test, the peak power (mean, 95 % CI, 413.8 w, 357.8 - 469.7 w and 403.8 w, 339.9 - 467.6 w, trial 1 and trial 2, respectively) or peak cadence (95.0 rev x min(-1), 89.5 - 100.5 rev x min(-1) and 95.1 rev x min(-1), 90.0 - 100.1 rev x min(-1), trial 1 and trial 2, respectively). Mean (+/- s) total distance over the 3-min was 2.23 +/- 0.23 km and 2.26 +/- 0.26 km for trial 1 and trial 2 respectively (p > 0.05). The coefficients of variation ranged from 0.9 - 5.4 % and the intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.96 - 0.99. It is concluded that in moderately trained subjects, the 3-min combination test provides reliable data and could therefore be used for short-term, high-intensity cycling intervention studies.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]