These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Quality management in surgery--an overview of methods and possibilities].
    Author: Schmidt C, Möller J, Reibe F, Güntert B, Kremer B.
    Journal: Chirurg; 2003 Jun; 74(6):501-9. PubMed ID: 12883799.
    Abstract:
    Numerous methods of assessing quality in health care have been presented over the last years. Since the German health care reform of 2000 introduced a legal obligation to quality assurance, hospitals have to meet that condition. However, no specific system of quality assurance was implicated. Therefore, many potential users search for systems suiting their own needs. However, German hospitals can benefit from international experience in quality management. Accreditation, visitation, excellence schemes, and certification seem to be the dominant methods. Every method is worthy of hospital evaluation. Certifications illustrate the quality system view without regard to profession, while excellence schemes evaluate the development of quality management in hospitals. Accreditation portrays a specific hospital as a whole, while visitations follow the professional perspective of quality assurance. Depending on the perspective and aims, there are advantages and disadvantages in each method. Finally, a combination of two may also be helpful. Indeed, no "role model" exists yet for assessing quality in health care. These methods of quality management are applicable especially in surgery, because a variety of standard outcome parameters such as length of stay, duration of procedure, and complication and relapse rates are already available.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]