These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Endosonographically controlled transluminal fine needle aspiration biopsy: diagnostic quality by cytologic and histopathologic classification].
    Author: Meyer S, Bittinger F, Keth A, Von Mach MA, Kann PH.
    Journal: Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2003 Jul 25; 128(30):1585-91. PubMed ID: 12884145.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has emerged as a highly accurate technique for detecting and classifying mediastinal and pancreatic lesions as well as abdominal and recently retroperitoneal masses with a minimum of risk for the patient. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To objectify these statements, we evaluated the quality of 72 EUS-FNA specimens by cytologic and histopathologic classification, investigated their contamination with tissue from the needle pathway and observed puncture-related complications in a retrospective study of 44 EUS-FNA in 41 consecutive patients (56 +/- 14 years, m = 24, f = 17; 13 pancreatic, 9 adrenal, 6 abdominal and 13 mediastinal masses). EUS-FNA was performed using a PENTAX 32 UA endosonoscope (longitudinal 7.5 MHz sector array) in combination with a needle system type "Hancke-Vilmann". RESULTS: 16 vs. 11 of 34 histopathologic and 38 cytologic specimens were classified "excellent", 7 vs. 10 "sufficient", 7 vs. 13 "poor" and 4 vs. 4 "failed". Analysis of contamination with tissue from the needle pathway showed 4 vs. 2 specimens "highly", 3 vs. 14 "clearly", 8 vs. 19 "slightly" and 19 vs. 3 "not" contaminated. Specimens classified "excellent" were less contaminated (p = 0,037). EUS-FNA identified 35 benign and 24 malignant masses. Definite diagnosis failed in 13 specimens. One nonfatal complication occurred. EUS-FNA is an accurate (89 %) and low-risk procedure to examine primary undiagnosed mediastinal, pancreatic, intraabdominal and especially adrenal lesions in most of the cases. Contamination with tissue from the needle pathway seems to be a major predictive factor of poor specimen quality and failed diagnosis. CONCLUSION: EUS-FNA expands the diagnostic approach of mediastinal, abdominal, pancreatic and adrenal masses and provides accurate specimens for reaching new differential-diagnostic competence, especially in endocrinologic cases.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]