These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Impact of medical prescription computerisation on the incidence of adverse drug effects].
    Author: Maurer C, Lecointre K, Cachin N, Latawiec K, Ouadfel F, Lahmek P, Fauvelle F, Piquet J.
    Journal: Rev Mal Respir; 2003 Jun; 20(3 Pt 1):355-63. PubMed ID: 12910110.
    Abstract:
    INTRODUCTION: Adverse drug effects are a significant public health problem. Prescription errors are responsible for a significant proportion of these adverse effects. METHODS: We have aimed to improve the link between generation of and interpretation of a prescription through computerisation. The prescription sheet, which is generated daily, was organised to allow care planning without the need to re-copy out treatments on the sheet. A prescription aid was available which was based on a core group of drugs commonly used in our respiratory service. The aim of the study was to compare the various types of errors observed during 6 weeks of computerized prescriptions (229 files) to a retrospective series of handwritten prescriptions of the service at an identical time (184 files) the previous year. The case-mix was identical for both analysed periods. RESULTS: The total number of technical prescribing errors in the 1,599 handwritten lines (49.27% error) was significantly higher (p<0.001) than the 1,805 computerized prescriptions lines (42.88% error). The errors of copying (p<0.001), eligibility (p<0.001) and incorrect spelling (p<0.05) were the main sources of error which were significantly reduced by computerisation. CONCLUSION: Computerised prescription is likely to reduce the incidence of prescribing errors and adverse drug effects.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]