These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Accuracy of transvaginal sonography, sonohysterography and hysteroscopy in diagnosis of intrauterine pathology].
    Author: Bartkowiak R, Kamiński P, Wielgoś M, Marianowski L.
    Journal: Ginekol Pol; 2003 Mar; 74(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 12916257.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: Sonohysterography (SHG) is a relatively new technique in evaluation of intrauterine disorders. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of this method with that of transvaginal sonography(TVS) and diagnostic hysteroscopy (DH) in diagnosis of intracavitary abnormalities in women with abnormal uterine bleeding, inconclusive endometrial view at TVS and thickened endometrium. METHODS: In prospective study, pre- and postmenopausal women underwent TVS, SHG, and DH. The findings at TVS and SHG were compared with hysteroscopic and histologic findings (obtained from operative hysteroscopy, hysterectomy and d&c). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated for focally growing lesions. RESULTS: 150 patients were included in the study. There was very good agreement between SHG and DH in the diagnosis of focally growing lesions. SHG was more sufficient in detecting intracavitary abnormalities than TVS. Problems with distention of the uterine cavity were due to cervical stenosis and endometrial carcinoma. CONCLUSION: SHG is more accurate in the diagnosis of intracavitary abnormalities than is TVS. SHG is almost as good as DH at detecting focally growing lesions in the uterine cavity.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]