These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Biochemical markers for prediction of 4-year response in bone mass during bisphosphonate treatment for prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis.
    Author: Ravn P, Thompson DE, Ross PD, Christiansen C.
    Journal: Bone; 2003 Jul; 33(1):150-8. PubMed ID: 12919710.
    Abstract:
    Short-term changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover (bone markers) have been suggested as predictors of long-term response in bone mass during antiresorptive treatment. In the Danish cohort (n = 306) of the Early Postmenopausal Intervention Cohort (EPIC) Study (n = 1609) of oral alendronate (ALN) for prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis, bone markers (urine C-telopeptides of type I collagen (uCTX), urine N-telopeptide cross-links of type I collagen (uNTX), serum total osteocalcin measured by ELISA [total OC (ELISA)], and serum total osteocalcin measured by RIA [total OC (RIA)]) were measured at 6-month intervals. The correlation between 6-month change in uCTX and 4-year change in spine and hip bone mineral density (BMD) was r = -0.41 and r = -0.42, respectively (P < 0.001). The corresponding values for the other bone markers were r = -0.53 and r = -0.42 (uNTX), r = -0.46 and r = -0.47 [total OC (ELISA)], and r = -0.43 and r = -0.41 [total OC (RIA)], all P < 0.001. ROC curves were used to analyse the ability of the bone markers to predict a change in spine BMD greater than 0%. The best performance [defined as the maximum value of (sensitivity plus specificity)] was found at the cut-off values of a -29% change from baseline in uCTX, a -45% change from baseline in uNTX, a -13% change from baseline in total OC (ELISA), and a -15% change from baseline in total OC (RIA). At these values the corresponding sensitivity was 66% (uCTX), 76% (uNTX), 70% [total OC (ELISA)], and 83% [total OC (RIA)]. The specificity was 80% (uCTX), 75% (uNTX), 71% [total OC (ELISA)], and 55% [total OC (RIA)]. The positive predictive value (PPV) was 82% (uCTX), 80% (uNTX), 77% [total OC (ELISA)], and 71% [total OC (RIA)]. The negative predictive value (NPV) was 64% (uCTX), 70% (uNTX), 64% [total OC (ELISA)], and 71% [total OC (RIA)]. In conclusion, the bone markers predicted a change in spine BMD greater than 0% with a high PPV and specificity. There was a trend toward better performance in this respect for the bone resorption markers.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]