These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Suggestions for implementation of DRG in the fields of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery for 2004].
    Author: Roeder N, Franz D, Siebert H, Frank D, Stücker R, Meiners T, Tempka A, Siebert CH.
    Journal: Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 12928992.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: The Implementation of a DRG-Variant in Germany - voluntarily since January 1 st, 2003 and obligatory from January 1 st, 2004 - has been leading to uncertainty, particularly in the hospitals, due to fears that currently practised German diagnostic and therapeutic measures will not be financed properly by a DRG-Variant. The G-DRG-Version 1.0 that was drawn up in connection with an executive order law is to a large degree identical to the Australian AR-DRG-Version 4.1. Adjustments to German requirements were made only marginally. Therefore it is necessary for every medical field to investigate by stock-taking to what extent currently practised German diagnostic and therapeutic measures are considered in the G-DRG-Version 1.0 and whether and where modifications and adaptations need to be made. In order to make qualified statements scientific evaluations of possible problems have to be made based German data. Therefore an evaluation was made of the mapping of the medical fields of orthopaedics and trauma surgery. The German Society of Trauma Surgery (DGU), the German Society of Orthopaedy and Orthopaedic Surgery (DGOOC) in cooperation with the DRG-Research-Group of the University Hospital Muenster, the German Hospital Federation (DKG) and the German Medical Association carried out a DRG evaluation project in order to investigate the medical and economical homogeneity of the case groups. METHOD: 12,645 orthopaedic and trauma surgery cases from 23 hospitals - 11 university hospitals and 12 non-university hospitals - were collected within an period of three months and were scientifically evaluated with regard to their performance homogeneity and length of stay homogeneity. RESULTS: The data formed the basis for the proof of suspected deficiencies of mapping of orthopaedic and trauma surgery cases within the G-DRG-Variant. Based on the data and additionally on conclusions of medical experts when the number of cases were small, 14 suggestions for adaptation were proposed and submitted by the deadline of March 31 st, 2003 to the InEK. CONCLUSION: The results of the DRG-Evaluation Project demonstrate the problems of mapping the very heterogenous and complex medical performances of orthopaedy and trauma surgery to a flat rate financing system that is not adapted properly to German conditions. The G-DRG-Variant Version 1.0 does not offer the sufficient possibilities of differentiation that are needed to map the various orthopaedical and trauma surgical measures in Germany.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]