These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Therapeutic apheresis in Sweden: update of epidemiology and adverse events.
    Author: Norda R, Stegmayr BG, Swedish Apheresis Group.
    Journal: Transfus Apher Sci; 2003 Oct; 29(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 12941356.
    Abstract:
    The indications of apheresis have changed over time due to results from various studies as well as the innovation of new techniques and ideas. To get an overview of the indications used for apheresis by colleagues elsewhere, data from registries are valuable. In addition, registries can be used for detection of severe adverse events as well as extent of adverse events in various types of treatment. To have a basis for statistical calculations, apheresis units need to be very large or centralisation of data needs to be performed. Data from more than 20000 procedures show that in about 4.3% of occasions adverse events and other problems will develop. Interruption of the procedure was done in 1%, most frequently a plasma exchange. Technical problems can be expected more frequent when performing LDL apheresis and immunoadsorption. Severe adverse events needing medication or interruption of the treatment, such as hypotension and arrhythmia, will develop in about 1% of the procedures. Such an episode occurs more often in patients with TTP/HUS and Guillain-Barré syndrome than in hypercholesterolemia, hyperviscosity syndrome or septic shock/MODS. The non-severe adverse events have increased over time. The results will provide focus in analyses for the reduction of such adverse events.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]