These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) vs gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA): improvement in intravascular signal intensity and contrast to noise ratio.
    Author: Pediconi F, Fraioli F, Catalano C, Napoli A, Danti M, Francone M, Venditti F, Nardis P, Passariello R.
    Journal: Radiol Med; 2003; 106(1-2):87-93. PubMed ID: 12951555.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare contrast enhanced MR angiography (MRA) with gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) to MRA with gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA), a high relaxivity paramagnetic contrast agent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve patients referred for carotid artery stenosis were examined with MR angiography using a fast spoiled gradient echo sequence. Gd-DTPA and Gd-BOPTA enhanced MR angiography were performed within 48-72 hours using a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg for Gd-BOPTA and 0.2 mmol/kg for Gd-DTPA, at a flow rate of 2 ml/s. Images were evaluated by two blinded radiologists. Qualitative and quantitative evaluations were performed comparing the sets of images from the two examinations. RESULTS: Qualitative evaluation demonstrated superior arterial contrast enhancement and vessel conspicuity with Gd-BOPTA compared with Gd-DTPA. Quantita-tive evaluation showed an improvement in both signal intensity and contrast to noise ratio with Gd-BOPTA. CONCLUSION: The greater relaxivity of Gd-BOPTA, at lower doses, compared with Gd-DTPA, provides higher intravascular signal and signal to noise ratio. Gd-BOPTA appears to be an optimal contrast agent for contrast enhanced MRA.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]