These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Assessment of cardiac preload and left ventricular function under increasing levels of positive end-expiratory pressure. Author: Luecke T, Roth H, Herrmann P, Joachim A, Weisser G, Pelosi P, Quintel M. Journal: Intensive Care Med; 2004 Jan; 30(1):119-26. PubMed ID: 12955175. Abstract: OBJECTIVE: (1) To assess the impact of high intrathoracic pressure on left ventricular volume and function. (2) To test the hypothesis that right ventricular end-diastolic volume (RVEDV) and intrathoracic blood volume (ITBV) represent cardiac preload and are superior to central venous pressure (CVP) or pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP). The validity of these parameters was tested by means of correlation with left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), the true cardiac preload. DESIGN: Prospective animal study. SUBJECTS: Fifteen adult sheep. INTERVENTIONS: All animals were studied before and after saline washout-induced lung injury, undergoing volume-controlled ventilation with increasing levels of PEEP (0, 7, 14 and 21 cmH2O, respectively). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), stroke volume (LVSV) and LVEDV were measured using computed tomography. ITBV and RVEDV were obtained by the thermal dye dilution technique. At PEEP 21 cmH2O, LVSV significantly decreased compared to baseline, PEEP 0 and PEEP 7 cmH2O. LVEDV was maintained except for the highest level of PEEP, while LVEF remained unchanged. RVEDV and RVEF also remained unchanged. The overall correlation of RVEDV and ITBV with LVEDV was satisfactory ( r=0.56 and r=0.62, respectively) and clearly superior to cardiac filling pressures. CONCLUSION: In the present study, (1) ventilation with increasing levels of PEEP did not alter RV function, while LV function was impaired at the highest level of PEEP; (2) unlike cardiac filling pressures, ITBV and RVEDV both provide valid estimates of cardiac preload even at high intrathoracic pressures.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]