These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Cost and cost-effectiveness of increased community and primary care facility involvement in tuberculosis care in Lilongwe District, Malawi.
    Author: Floyd K, Skeva J, Nyirenda T, Gausi F, Salaniponi F.
    Journal: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis; 2003 Sep; 7(9 Suppl 1):S29-37. PubMed ID: 12971652.
    Abstract:
    SETTING: Lilongwe District, Malawi. OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost and cost-effectiveness of new treatment strategies for new pulmonary tuberculosis patients, introduced in 1997. METHODS: For new smear-positive pulmonary patients, two strategies were compared: 1) the strategy used until the end of October 1997, involving 2 months of hospitalisation at the beginning of treatment, and 2) a new decentralised strategy introduced in November 1997, in which patients were given the choice of in- or outpatient care during the first 2 months of treatment. For new smear-negative pulmonary patients, the two strategies compared were 1) the strategy used until the end of October 1997, which did not require any direct observation of treatment (DOT) and 2) a new community-based strategy introduced in November 1997, which required DOT by a community member 'guardian' or a health worker for the first 2 months of treatment. Costs were analysed from the perspective of health services, patients, and the community in 1998 US dollars, using standard methods. Cost-effectiveness was calculated as the cost per patient cured (smear-positive cases) and as the cost per patient completing treatment (new smear-negative cases). FINDINGS: For new smear-positive patients, the cost per patient treated was dollars 456 with the conventional hospital-based strategy, and dollars 106 with the new decentralised strategy. Costs fell by 54% for health services and 58% for patients. The cost per patient cured was dollars 787 for the conventional hospital-based strategy, and dollars 296 for decentralised treatment. For smear-negative patients, the cost per patient treated was dollars 67 with the conventional unsupervised strategy, and dollars 101 with the community-based DOT strategy. Costs increased for health services, patients and guardians. Cost-effectiveness was similar with both strategies, at around dollars 200 per patient completing treatment. When new smear-positive and new smear-negative patients were considered together, the new strategies were associated with a 50% reduction in total annual costs. CONCLUSION: There is a strong economic case for expansion of decentralisation and community-based DOT in Malawi. Further investment in training and programme supervision may help to increase effectiveness.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]