These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Response-shift bias and parent-reported quality of life in children with otitis media.
    Author: Timmerman AA, Anteunis LJ, Meesters CM.
    Journal: Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2003 Sep; 129(9):987-91. PubMed ID: 12975273.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: To validate the 6-item quality-of-life survey (OM-6) and to investigate response-shift bias regarding children with otitis media. SETTING: Otorhinolaryngology department of a university hospital that serves the southernmost part of the Netherlands. PATIENTS: Seventy-seven children (age range, 12-38 months) experiencing persistent otitis media with effusion and scheduled for placement of tympanostomy tubes. SURVEY: The OM-6 measures health-related quality of life in 6 domains: physical suffering, hearing loss, speech impairment, emotional distress, activity limitations, and caregiver concerns. INTERVENTION: Parents completed the OM-6 before surgery (pretest) and 6 weeks after surgery (posttest). At the posttest, parents also completed a retrospective version of the pretest (retrospective pretest). RESULTS: For most items, the test-retest reliability was good (R>0.8). The internal consistency of the OM-6 was satisfactory (alpha =.79). The construct validity, determined by correlating the ear-related global quality-of-life measure and the OM-6 summary score, was fair (R = -0.77, P<.01). Prospective change in quality of life on the OM-6 ranged from moderate (standardized response mean >/=0.5) to large (standardized response mean >/=0.8). Response-shift bias was present at the group level (t = -3.3, P<.01). Retrospective change was significant for hearing loss (z = -3.3, P<.05) and ear-related global quality of life (z = -3.6, P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: The validity of the OM-6 has been proved in a Dutch population. The data suggest that parents underestimate the seriousness of hearing loss and overestimate the quality of life of their child before surgery, indicating a response shift. Treatment results could lead parents to realize that the situation before surgery had been worse than they thought.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]