These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Bond strengths of various materials to dentin using Amalgambond.
    Author: Miller BH, Arita K, Tamura N, Nishino M, Guo I, Okabe T.
    Journal: Am J Dent; 1992 Oct; 5(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 1299256.
    Abstract:
    This study evaluated the bond strength of four restorative materials to dentin using Amalgambond. Two high-copper amalgams [Tytin; spherical, (T) and Epoque 80; lathe-cute, (E)], a gallium alloy [Gallium Alloy GF (G) and a resin composite [P-50 (P)] were tested. The polished dentin surface was treated with dentin-enamel activator (10 seconds), washed, dried, and adhesive agent was applied (30 seconds). In group A, the dentin adhesive was placed onto the dentin and while still wet, T, E, or G was condensed in cylinders (4 mm diameter) with condensation forces suggested by the manufacturer for a clinical situation. In group B, the cylindrical specimens of restorative material were allowed to set and then adhered to the treated dentin using the adhesive system. For the composite (control), the adhesive was applied to the treated dentin and while still wet, P was layered into the cylinder and cured for a total of 90 seconds. After storage in water (37 degrees C) for 24 hours, all the specimens were tested for tensile bond strength. This study revealed that the bond strength of P was significantly higher than the other materials tested and also that amalgam allowed to set for 1, 6 or 24 hours before adhesion to dentin had a significantly greater bond strength than freshly condensed amalgam. Although the desired high bond strength did not develop in the bonding of the metallic restorative materials, signs of bonding were found.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]