These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The molecular mechanism for the tetrameric association of glycogen phosphorylase promoted by protein phosphorylation.
    Author: Barford D, Johnson LN.
    Journal: Protein Sci; 1992 Apr; 1(4):472-93. PubMed ID: 1304350.
    Abstract:
    The allosteric transition of glycogen phosphorylase promoted by protein phosphorylation is accompanied by the association of a pair of functional dimers to form a tetramer. The conformational changes within the dimer that lead to the creation of a protein recognition surface have been analyzed from a comparison of the crystal structures of T-state dimeric phosphorylase b and R-state tetrameric phosphorylase a. Regions of the structure that participate in the tetramer interface are situated within structural subdomains. These include the glycogen storage subdomain, the C-terminal subdomain and the tower helix. The subdomains undergo concerted conformational transitions on conversion from the T to the R state (overall r.m.s. shifts between 1 and 1.7 A) and, together with the quaternary conformational change within the functional dimer, create the tetramer interface. The glycogen storage subdomain and the C-terminal subdomain are distinct from those regions that contribute to the dimer interface, but shifts in the subdomains are correlated with the allosteric transitions that are mediated by the dimer interface. The structural properties of the tetramer interface are atypical of an oligomeric protein interface and are more similar to protein recognition surfaces observed in protease inhibitors and antibody-protein antigen complexes. There is a preponderance of polar and charged residues at the tetramer interface and a high number of H-bonds per surface area (one H-bond per 130 A2). In addition, the surface area made inaccessible at the interface is relatively small (1,142 A2 per subunit on dimer to tetramer association compared with 2,217 A2 per subunit on monomer-to-dimer association).
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]