These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Left atrial booster pump function in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and essential hypertension: evaluations based on left atrial pressure-volume relationship].
    Author: Sanada H, Shimizu M, Kita Y, Sugihara N, Shimizu K, Murakami T, Takeda R, Mifune J.
    Journal: J Cardiol; 1992; 22(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 1307583.
    Abstract:
    In patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and essential hypertension (HT), left ventricular dysfunction in early diastole which is associated with left atrial contraction plays an important role in left ventricular filling. To evaluate left atrial booster pump function, we analyzed left atrial preload (left atrial pressure at the end of diastasis; LAPd, left atrial volume index at the end of diastasis; LAVd), left atrial afterload (left ventricular end-diastolic pressure; LVEDP, left ventricular chamber stiffness constant; K), and left atrial ejection indices (left atrial ejection fraction during atrial contraction; LAEF, left atrial ejection volume index during atrial contraction; ACVI). The study subjects consisted of control subjects (n = 5), HT patients (n = 6), and HCM patients (n = 11). The left ventricular wall was significantly thicker in the HT and HCM groups. The left ventricular rapid filling volume index was less in the HT group, and significantly less in the HCM than in the control group. LAPd and LAVd were greater in the HT group than in the control group, and greater in the HCM group than in the HT group. LVEDP and K were greater in the HT group than in the control group, and significantly greater in the HCM group than in the other 2 groups. ACVI was greater in the HT group than in the control group, but in the HCM group, ACVI was significantly less than in the HT group and did not differ significantly from that in the control group. LAEF was significantly less in the HCM group than in the other 2 groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]