These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Opposite effects of enantiomers of clofibric acid derivative on rat skeletal muscle chloride conductance: antagonism studies and theoretical modeling of two different receptor site interactions.
    Author: De Luca A, Tricarico D, Wagner R, Bryant SH, Tortorella V, Conte Camerino D.
    Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1992 Jan; 260(1):364-8. PubMed ID: 1309879.
    Abstract:
    The R-(+) enantiomer of 2-(p-chlorophenoxy) propionic acid (CPP) produces a biphasic effect on chloride channel conductance (GCl) of rat skeletal muscle, increasing GCl at low concentrations and decreasing it at concentrations greater than 10 microM; on the other hand, the S-(-) isomer mostly blocks GCl in a concentration-dependent manner. To explain the peculiar behavior of these compounds, a theoretical model based on the presence of two opposing receptor populations controlling chloride channel conductance has been used to fit the experimental data of the concentration-response curves of both S-(-) and R-(+) CPP. An analysis performed by means of the algebraic summation of two logistic terms suggests a reasonable merit of the proposed model and explains the resultant effect of each optical form as follows: S-(-) acts as a full agonist on an inhibitory sites, whereas R-(+) acts as a full agonist at both the inhibitory and excitatory sites. Antagonism studies appear to be consistent with the proposed model. Dose-response curves in which the block of GCl by the S-(-) isomer was evaluated in the presence of the R-(+) isomer (3-10 microM) clearly showed an antagonistic interaction between the two enantiomers, with an increase in the S-(-) concentration for half-maximal block. The antagonism was overcome by high concentrations of S-(-), and this might be consistent with the hypothesis that the block of GCl is modulated by an inhibitory site at which the two enantiomers compete.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]