These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Semipermeable membrane devices accumulate conserved ratios of sterane and hopane petroleum biomarkers.
    Author: Luellen DR, Shea D.
    Journal: Chemosphere; 2003 Nov; 53(7):705-13. PubMed ID: 13129510.
    Abstract:
    Semipermeable membrane devices (SPMDs) are commonly used as a time-integrated measure of aqueous concentrations of persistent hydrophobic chemicals, including PAH, pesticides, dioxins, and PCBs. Another class of persistent hydrophobic chemicals is petroleum biomarker compounds (hopanes and steranes) that are used for hydrocarbon source identification and allocation. In this study three different passive sampling device designs were exposed to a complex hydrocarbon mixture (Alaska North Slope crude) in a laboratory experiment to determine uptake rates of biomarkers into SPMDs. In addition to the standard triolein filled SPMDs, iso-octane filled SPMDs (ISPMDs) and unfilled low-density polyethylene strips (PESDs) were tested. Uptake rates and effective sampling rates were determined for 53 compounds. There was little variation in sampling rates among the individual biomarkers; average values (ld(-1)) for hopanes were 0.43+/-0.07 (PESD), 0.33+/-0.06 (SPMD), and 0.44+/-0.03 (ISPMD) and average sterane sampling rates were 0.57+/-0.04 (PESD), 0.42+/-0.03 (SPMD), and 0.53+/-0.03 (ISPMD). The primary reason for biomarker analysis is for source discrimination of petroleum. Nineteen different diagnostic ratios were measured, and were found to be remarkably well conserved between the oil, water, and all three devices. This indicates that SPMDs, PESDs, and ISPMDs should each be effective for source discrimination studies of petroleum contamination.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]