These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Genetic engineering of redox donor sites: measurement of intracomplex electron transfer between ruthenium-65-cytochrome b5 and cytochrome c.
    Author: Willie A, Stayton PS, Sligar SG, Durham B, Millett F.
    Journal: Biochemistry; 1992 Aug 18; 31(32):7237-42. PubMed ID: 1324708.
    Abstract:
    The de novo design and synthesis of ruthenium-labeled cytochrome b5 that is optimized for the measurement of intracomplex electron transfer to cytochrome c are described. A single cysteine was substituted for Thr-65 of rat liver cytochrome b5 by recombinant DNA techniques [Stayton, P. S., Fisher, M. T., & Sligar, S. G. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 13544-13548]. The single sulfhydryl group on T65C cytochrome b5 was then labeled with [4-(bromomethyl)-4'-methylbipyridine] (bisbipyridine)ruthenium2+ to form Ru-65-cyt b5. The ruthenium group at Cys-65 is only 12 A from the heme group of cytochrome b5 but is not located at the binding site for cytochrome c. Laser excitation of the complex between Ru-65-cyt b5 and cytochrome c results in electron transfer from the excited state Ru(II*) to the heme group of Ru-65-cyt b5 with a rate constant greater than 10(6) s-1. Subsequent electron transfer from the heme group of Ru-65-cyt b5 to the heme group of cytochrome c is biphasic, with a fast-phase rate constant of (4 +/- 1) x 10(5) s-1 and a slow-phase rate constant of (3 +/- 1) x 10(4) s-1. This suggests that the complex can assume two different conformations with different electron-transfer properties. The reaction becomes monophasic and the rate constant decreases as the ionic strength is increased, indicating dissociation of the complex.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]