These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Results of radiotherapy with curative intent in non-small cell lung cancer. An analysis of 130 patients. Author: Reinfuss M, Skolyszewski J, Korzeniowski S, Rzepecki W. Journal: Strahlenther Onkol; 1992 Oct; 168(10):573-8. PubMed ID: 1332202. Abstract: Between 1970 and 1985, 130 patients were irradiated with curative intent at the Center of Oncology in Kraków. The histological diagnosis was squamous-cell carcinoma in 60.8% of patients, adenocarcinoma in 25.4% of patients and other non-small cell cancer in 13.8% of patients. Out of 130 irradiated patients 21.5% refused surgery, 26.2% were inoperable for medical reasons, and 52.3% had unresectable tumors. According to the UICC TNM 1987 classification, 62 (47.7%) patients had early (stages I and II) disease. The remaining 68 (52.3%) patients had stage III A cancer. Additional criteria for patients selection to radiotherapy with curative intent were: Karnofsky performance status > or = 50, and no respiratory insufficiency. All patients were treated with megavoltage radiation. Patients with stage I were treated by three isocentric beams. Tumor dose was 6000 cGy in 24 fractions over five weeks. In patients with stage II and III A disease the radiotherapy was started with two parallel opposed beams encompassing primary lesion and mediastinum. The dose of 4000 cGy was given in 20 fractions over four weeks, followed by a "boost" dose of 2000 cGy in the fractions over two weeks, delivered with three isocentric beams. 54% of patients were disease-free at the twelfth month, 24.6% at the 36th month, and 18.5% of patients survived five years without evidence of cancer. A significantly better survival has been observed in patients with stages I and II, with Karnofsky performance status > or = 70, and with complete radiological regression eight weeks after radiation therapy. The main cause of failure of the treatment were distant metastases.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]