These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: [Endovenous thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarct. The experience in a community hospital. An analysis of 120 patients]. Author: Jorge Sdo C. Journal: Arq Bras Cardiol; 1992 Jul; 59(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 1341143. Abstract: PURPOSE: To demonstrate the experience with thrombolytic therapy in a community hospital without a cardiac catheterization laboratory. METHODS: One hundred and twenty patients with EKG evidence of acute myocardial infarction with less than 6 hours of pain entered the study. They were retrospectively subdivided into two groups: group 1 (n = 96) received streptokinase and group 2 (n = 24) received rt-PA. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty patients were analysed. Ninety six (80%) received SK and 24 (20%) received intravenous rt-PA. Infarct side was anterior in 57 cases (47.5%) and inferior and/or lateral in 63 (52.5%). Coronary-angiography performed prior the discharge in reference hospital demonstrated patency of culprit vessel in 69 patients (80%) treated with SK and in 22 (91%) treated with rt-PA. According to clinical and angiographic data 60 patients (50%) were managed with medical treatment, 31 (25.8%) were submitted to angioplasty of the culprit artery and 29 (24.1%) underwent coronary bypass surgery. The complications were intracranial hemorrhage in 2 cases (1.6%), 1 post SK (1.0%) and 1 post rt-PA (4%); both of these patients died; reinfarction occurred in 4 patients and in 3 of them SK infusion was repeated successfully. There were no reinfarction in patients receiving rt-PA; major bleeding requiring blood transfusion occurred in 2 patients (1.6%); 1 patient developed hemothorax post SK and another one treated with rt-PA developed hematoma of left inferior limb. Eleven patients (9.1%) died during the hospital stay; 2 patients died of intracranial hemorrhage, 7 of cardiogenic shock and 2 had sudden death. The mortality rate in patient with anterior wall infarction was 15.7%, whereas it was significantly lower in the remaining patients (3.1%, p < 0.05). Only 4 patients over the age 75 received thrombolysis and 2 of them (50%) died. CONCLUSION: Intravenous thrombolytic therapy was safe and feasible in a community hospital without cardiac catheterization facilities. We observed only 2 fatal complications (1.6%) directly related to drug management (intracranial hemorrhage). The hospital mortality was 9.1%, including patient undergoing angioplasty of surgery following thrombolytic therapy.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]