These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Controlled trial of endoscopic injection treatment for bleeding from peptic ulcers with visible vessels. Author: Oxner RB, Simmonds NJ, Gertner DJ, Nightingale JM, Burnham WR. Journal: Lancet; 1992 Apr 18; 339(8799):966-8. PubMed ID: 1348805. Abstract: Controlled trials have shown that bleeding peptic ulcers can be successfully treated by endoscopy and injection of adrenaline, with or without sclerosant. However, these trials have been done in major research centres, and endoscopic treatment of upper gastrointestinal bleeding has not yet become routine in general hospitals. We have done a prospective, randomised, controlled trial of injection treatment for bleeding peptic ulcers in a district general hospital. Between April, 1989, and June, 1991, all patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 555) underwent endoscopy by an experienced endoscopist within 24 h of admission. 98 patients were found to have an ulcer with a visible vessel, of whom 93 were randomised to injection (n = 48) or standard treatment alone (n = 45). Injection treatment consisted of 1-2 ml of 1 in 10,000 adrenaline injected at four to six sites around the ulcer. Adrenaline and 5% ethanolamine oleate (1-2 ml) were then injected directly into the vessel. The medical team managing the patient was unaware of the endoscopic treatment given. The two groups were similar for age, initial haemoglobin concentration, shock, and ulcer site. Rebleeding (injected 8 [16.7%] vs control 21 [46.7%], p = 0.011) was significantly reduced in treated patients. The treated group also had lower mortality (4 [8.3%] vs 9 [20%]), requirement for surgery (4 [8.3%] vs 8 [17.8%]), and mean blood-transfusion requirement (5 vs 7.5 units). Endoscopic injection treatment in our patients significantly reduced rebleeding rate and may have other benefits. This cheap and widely applicable treatment can be used routinely in the management of patients with bleeding peptic ulcers who are at high risk of rebleeding.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]