These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Randomised trial of cardiotocography alone or with ST waveform analysis for intrapartum monitoring.
    Author: Westgate J, Harris M, Curnow JS, Greene KR.
    Journal: Lancet; 1992 Jul 25; 340(8813):194-8. PubMed ID: 1353134.
    Abstract:
    It is possible to record the fetal electrocardiographic waveform (ECG) from the scalp electrode used in labour for detection of fetal heart rate. Animal and observational studies of changes in the ST waveform of the ECG during hypoxia suggest that a combination of heart rate and ST waveform analysis might improve the predictive value of intrapartum monitoring. In a randomised trial, we have studied intervention rates and neonatal outcome for high-risk labours monitored either by conventional cardiotocography (CTG) or by ST waveform analysis plus CTG. 1200 women with pregnancy of at least 34 weeks' gestation were assigned to the groups when the decision to apply a fetal scalp electrode was made. Neonatal outcome was assessed by umbilical-cord blood gas analysis, Apgar scores, resuscitation needed, and postnatal course. All recordings were retrospectively viewed by an observer unaware of clinical details to check adherence to the trial protocol. The addition of ST waveform monitoring to CTG substantially reduced the proportion of deliveries for fetal distress (ST + CTG 27/615 vs CTG 58/606; p less than 0.001). The groups did not differ in rate of operative delivery for other reasons, incidence of asphyxia at birth, or neonatal outcome. Metabolic acidosis and low 5 min Apgar scores were less common in the ST + CTG than the CTG group, but not significantly so. The only case of birth asphyxia in the ST + CTG group was identified by both heart rate and ST changes. The review of recordings showed that the reduction in intervention rate was among cases with CTG patterns classified as normal or intermediate, whereas there was no difference in intervention rates among cases with abnormal recordings. Our findings confirm that ST waveform analysis discriminates CTG changes in labour and that our protocol for interpretation is safe. Further randomised studies are warranted.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]