These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: L-dopa-like regulatory actions of L-threo-3,4-dihydroxyphenylserine on the release of endogenous noradrenaline via presynaptic receptors in rat hypothalamic slices. Author: Yue JL, Goshima Y, Nakamura S, Misu Y. Journal: J Pharm Pharmacol; 1992 Dec; 44(12):990-5. PubMed ID: 1361565. Abstract: Effects of L-threo-3,4-dihydroxyphenylserine (L-threo-DOPS) on the spontaneous release and the stimulus(2 Hz)-evoked release of endogenous noradrenaline were studied in rat hypothalamic slices with functioning L-aromatic amino acid decarboxylase (AADC) and with AADC inhibition. In non-inhibited slices, spontaneous release was not modified by L-threo-DOPS at 1 pM-100 nM, tended to increase at 1-10 microM and increased at 100 microM. Noradrenaline tissue content slightly increased at 100 microM. Stimulated release was concentration-dependently facilitated at 1-1000 pM and tended to decrease gradually from a maximum at 10 nM-10 microM. Under AADC inhibition, spontaneous release concentration-dependently increased at 10-100 microM by 60% of the increase seen in slices without AADC inhibition. Increase in noradrenaline tissue content was abolished. L-threo-DOPS produced a triphasic pattern on stimulated release; concentration-dependent facilitation at 1-1000 pM similar to that seen in slices with functional AADC, no facilitation at 10-1000 nM, and a concentration-dependent increment at 10-100 microM. The facilitation at 1 nM was stereoselective and was antagonized by (-)-propranolol 10 nM, and no facilitation at 100 nM was restored to the maximum by yohimbine 10 nM, DG-5128 10 nM or S-sulpiride 1 nM. Furthermore, L-threo-DOPS (1-1000 pM)-induced facilitation was competitively antagonized by L-dopa methyl ester, a competitive antagonist for L-dopa, with a pA2 value of 13.6, whereas it was noncompetitively antagonized by (-)-propranolol.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]