These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Dual effects of endothelins -1, -2 and -3 on guinea pig field-stimulated ileum: possible mediation by two receptors coupled to pertussis toxin-insensitive mechanisms. Author: Guimarães CL, Rae GA. Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1992 Jun; 261(3):1253-9. PubMed ID: 1376359. Abstract: This study compared the effects of endothelin-1 (ET-1), ET-2 and ET-3 on the guinea pig field-stimulated ileum. All ETs (0.3-30 nM) caused graded inhibitions of nerve-mediated responses followed by sustained contractions. The rank order of potencies for the twitch depressor effect (IC50S) was ET-3 = ET-1 greater than ET-2, with ET-3 causing greater maximal inhibition than ET-1 or ET-2. The rank order of potencies for contraction (EC50S) was ET-1 = ET-2 greater than ET-3, with ET-1 causing greater maximal contraction than ET-2 or ET-3. Twitch inhibition by ET-1 (3 nM) was unaffected by indomethacin (5.6 microM), cromakalim (10 microM), glibenclamide (3 microM) or nicardipine (0.1 microM). ET-1-induced contraction was unaltered by tetrodotoxin (0.3 microM), atropine (0.3 microM) or glibenclamide, but was reduced by indomethacin. Cromakalim and nicardipine virtually abolished ET-1-induced contraction. ET-1 (up to 30 nM) did not potentiate submaximal contractions induced by acetylcholine, histamine, bradykinin or substance P. ET-3 relaxed ileal segments precontracted with either acetylcholine (0.3 microM) or histamine (1 microM). Pretreatment of guinea pigs with pertussis toxin (50 micrograms/kg i.p., 6 days beforehand) did not influence either effects of ET-1 on the field-stimulated ileum. Our data suggest that the dual effects of ETs on the guinea pig isolated ileum are mediated by distinct receptors and possibly involve different mechanisms of action. The transient inhibition of responses to field stimulation seems unrelated to activation of ATP-sensitive potassium channels and is rather insensitive to L-type Ca++ channel blockade.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]