These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Status of fractionated abrasion and vaginal endocervical cytology in diagnosis of endometrial cancer].
    Author: Schild R, Kutta T.
    Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1992 Aug; 52(8):467-70. PubMed ID: 1397942.
    Abstract:
    The predictive value of cervical cytology and uterine curettage in 150 endometrial carcinoma was investigated. Cytology proved negative in 56% of all carcinomas and in 42.2% of those in stage 2 or 3. Uterine curettage was found to have a false-negative rate of 6%, endocervical curettage of 5.3%. By contrast, we found a high false-positive rate of 70.8% for endocervical curettage. 13.2% of the 129 endometrial carcinoma stage 1 had a false-positive endocervical fraction. No residual disease was found in 4.7% of all 150 hysterectomy specimens. Negative cervical cytology seems to be a reasonably good predictor of actual cervical involvement, if a positive endocervical curettage is to be interpreted.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]