These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Relations among different measures of speech reception in subjects using a cochlear implant.
    Author: Rabinowitz WM, Eddington DK, Delhorne LA, Cuneo PA.
    Journal: J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Oct; 92(4 Pt 1):1869-81. PubMed ID: 1401531.
    Abstract:
    A comprehensive set of speech reception measures were obtained in a group of about 20 postlingually deafened adult users of the Ineraid multichannel cochlear implant. The measures included audio, visual, and audiovisual recognition of words embedded in two types of sentences (with differing degrees of difficulty) and audio-only recognition of isolated monosyllabic words, consonant identification (12 alternatives, /Ca/), and vowel identification (8 alternatives, /bVt/). For most implantees, the audiovisual gains in the sentence tests were very high. Quantitative relations among audio-only scores were assessed using power-law transformations suggested by Boothroyd and Nittrouer [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84, 101-114 (1988)] that can account for the benefit of sentence context (via a factor k) and the relation between word and phoneme recognition (via a factor j). Across the broad range of performance that existed among the subjects, substantial order was observed among measures of speech reception along the continuum from recognition of words in sentences, words in isolation, speech segments, and the retrieval of underlying phonetic features. Correlations exceeded 0.85 among direct and sentence-derived measures of isolated word recognition as well as among direct and word-derived measures of segmental recognition. Results from a variety of other studies involving presentation of limited auditory signals, single-channel and multichannel implants, and tactual systems revealed a similar pattern among word recognition, overall consonant identification performance, and consonantal feature recruitment. Finally, improving the reception of consonantal place cues was identified as key to producing the greatest potential gains in speech reception.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]