These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Perioperative diagnosis of acute myocardial ischemia].
    Author: Hopf HB, Tarnow J.
    Journal: Anaesthesist; 1992 Sep; 41(9):509-19. PubMed ID: 1416005.
    Abstract:
    The prevalence of coronary artery disease substantially affects both cardiac and noncardiac surgery. Assuming that biometric data reported from North America are representative for Germany, the following incidences can be estimated: around 1 million out of 8 million patients operated upon each year will suffer from coronary artery disease, and 15,000 of these patients will have a perioperative myocardial infarction. Since a close relationship has been shown between pre-, intra-, and postoperative myocardial ischaemia and postoperative cardiac morbidity and mortality, early diagnosis and therapy of acute perioperative myocardial ischaemia is warranted. The purpose of this review is to weigh critically the various methods for diagnosis of myocardial ischaemia in view of their practicability and cost/benefit relationship in the perioperative setting. The symptoms of angina pectoris are unreliable in the perioperative period, since patients are premedicated preoperatively, without symptoms during anaesthesia, and usually receive analgesics postoperatively. Intraoperative detection of myocardial ischaemia focuses on standard electrocardiography (ECG) with on-line registration of the ST-segment in two leads (usually leads II and V5) and automatic analysis of ST-segment deviation, achieving a sensitivity of 80% in the detection of myocardial ischaemia. Measurement of regional wall motion abnormalities with trans-esophageal echocardiography (TEE) is a more sensitive method of myocardial ischaemia detection compared to ECG. However, several reasons preclude the broader application of this method in the perioperative phase: (1) it lacks validation by an accepted and independent gold standard; (2) there is a wide spectrum of false-positive findings (considerable interindividual variations in left ventricular contraction, bundle branch blocks, hypertension, hypervolemia); (3) changes in the inferior and apical segments of the left ventricle cannot be detected by single-plane TOE. Detection in these segments might be achieved with biplane echocardiography, but few data on this improved technique are presently available; (4) the method is semi-invasive and might be not applicable during periods with a high incidence of myocardial ischaemia, e.g., intubation, the end of anaesthesia, and extubation; (5) anaesthetists seldom fulfil standard guidelines in echocardiography training; and (6) the method is expensive, which also limits its broader application. Cardiokymography, a noninvasive technique, allows analog representation of anterior wall motion.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]