These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Intraperitoneal administration of recombinant human erythropoietin. Author: Frenken LA, Struijk DG, Coppens PJ, Tiggeler RG, Krediet RT, Koene RA. Journal: Perit Dial Int; 1992; 12(4):378-83. PubMed ID: 1420497. Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of intraperitoneal administration of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients compared to subcutaneous rHuEPO. DESIGN: Prospective analysis of an open, nonrandomized investigation. SETTING: Outpatient CAPD clinics in two university hospitals. PATIENTS: Nine adult CAPD patients receiving rHuEPO intraperitoneally and 8 patients receiving rHuEPO subcutaneously. INTERVENTION: One hundred units of rHuEPO per kilogram of body weight were administered three times a week for 8 weeks or until the target hematocrit of 35% was reached. Thereafter, dosages of rHuEPO were adjusted for response. Intraperitoneal rHuEPO was administered in 1 L of dialysis solution during the night. MEASUREMENTS: Efficacy was assessed by measuring the increase in hemoglobin. Tolerance was assessed by monitoring side effects. RESULTS: In the first 8 weeks of treatment hemoglobin concentration increased from 64.5 +/- 12.9 g/L to 98.3 +/- 16.1 g/L (p < 0.0005) in the intraperitoneally treated group. In the subcutaneously treated group hemoglobin increased significantly faster (p < 0.05) from 72.5 +/- 4.8 g/L to 119.2 +/- 11.3 g/L (p < 0.0005) in the same period. Antihypertensive medication had to be increased or instituted in most of the patients in both groups. The incidence of peritonitis in the intraperitoneally treated group was not increased when compared to the pretreatment incidence. CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneously administered rHuEPO is superior to intraperitoneally administered rHuEPO with regard to the required dosages. However, the results of this study show that intraperitoneal administration of rHuEPO might be a convenient and safe alternative when subcutaneous administration is undesirable.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]