These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: In vitro susceptibility of Haemophilus influenzae to cefaclor, cefixime, cefetamet and loracarbef. Author: Williams JD, Powell M, Fah YS, Seymour A, Yuan M. Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1992 Aug; 11(8):748-51. PubMed ID: 1425737. Abstract: The susceptibility of 2,212 Haemophilus influenzae isolates cultured in UK clinical laboratories in 1991 was determined for four orally-administered beta-lactam drugs. These isolates included 1,893 ampicillin-susceptible, 191 beta-lactamase-positive and 128 ampicillin-resistant, beta-lactamase-negative Haemophilus influenzae. While 150 (6.8%) isolates were resistant to cefaclor (MIC > or = 16 mg/l) and 85 (3.8%) to loracarbef, all were inhibited by < or = 2 mg/l cefetamet and < or = 1 mg/l cefixime and were therefore susceptible to these agents. Ranges and modes of inhibition zone diameters and MICs indicated that the susceptibility of a variable proportion of the 191 beta-lactamase-positive isolates to cefaclor, loracarbef and cefetamet was reduced compared with the fully susceptible population. In contrast, a major reduction in susceptibility to all four antimicrobial agents was seen among the 128 ampicillin-resistant (MIC 1-64 mg/l) beta-lactamase-negative isolates such that these accounted for 53% and 67% of the total number of organisms resistant to cefaclor and loracarbef respectively. In addition, 23 of 25 isolates inhibited only by > or = 1 mg/l cefetamet and all eight inhibited only by > or = 0.5 mg/l cefixime showed this type of resistance to ampicillin. Results indicate the importance of detecting non-beta-lactamase-mediated resistance to ampicillin and any concomitant diminished susceptibility to other beta-lactam drugs.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]