These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Low-frequency specificity of the auditory brainstem response threshold elicited by clicks masked with 1590-Hz high-pass noise in subjects with sloping cochlear hearing losses.
    Author: Conijn EA, Brocaar MP, van Zanten GA.
    Journal: Audiology; 1992; 31(5):272-83. PubMed ID: 1449430.
    Abstract:
    In this study, the frequency specificity of the ABR threshold to stimulation with a click masked with 1590-Hz high-pass noise was determined in subjects with sloping cochlear hearing losses both high- and low-frequency in character. The results show that the ABR threshold elicited by this stimulus is low-frequency specific. The standard error in estimating the 1,000-Hz pure-tone threshold from the high-pass-noise-masked click-evoked ABR threshold is 10.2 dB which equals that for estimating the 3,000-Hz pure-tone threshold from the routinely used unmasked click ABR threshold. The ABR threshold elicited by a click masked with 1590-Hz high-pass noise can therefore be regarded as an accurate tool to predict the pure-tone hearing loss at 1,000 Hz. However, this method is less suitable for routine clinical testing because of the masking noise needed: the occasional high loudness level adversely affects the response quality and reduces the dynamic range of pure-tone hearing losses to be assessed. A third disadvantage is that determining the masking level electrophysiologically for each ear is time consuming. The search for a method with no or less masking noise should therefore continue.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]