These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Haemodilutional effect of standard fluid management limits the effectiveness of acute normovolaemic haemodilution in AAA surgery--results of a pilot trial. Author: Wolowczyk L, Nevin M, Smith FC, Baird RN, Lamont PM. Journal: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2003 Oct; 26(4):405-11. PubMed ID: 14512004. Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of standard fluid management on the effectiveness of ANH as a blood conservation method in elective open AAA repair. DESIGN: Prospective randomised controlled study. METHODS: Thirty-four patients undergoing elective AAA repair were randomised to have ANH (16) or act as controls (18). Intra-operative cell salvage was permitted in both groups. Haemoglobin (Hb) concentrations were determined at variable intervals peri-operatively. Blood loss and the use of heterologous blood were recorded. RESULTS: The pre- and post-operative Hb concentrations, surgical blood loss and the use of cell salvage were similar in both groups. Hb concentration (median, range) decreased significantly from pre-operative to aortic clamping (with blood loss <100 ml) in ANH patients from 8.8 (7.5-10.2) to 5.7 (4.2-6.6)mmol/l following ANH but also in controls from 8.6 (7.5-9.7) to 7.0 (4.5-9.0)mmol/l due to fluid infusion (P<0.01 for every comparison). Bank blood requirements were similar: median 2 units in ANH and 2.5 units in control patients (P=0.68). CONCLUSIONS: Large volumes of fluids infused during AAA repair already conserve blood by the mechanism of hypervolaemic haemodilution. When cell salvage is used with standard fluid management during AAA repair, additional ANH is ineffective in saving blood.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]