These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Recurrence of low back pain: definition-sensitivity analysis using administrative data.
    Author: Wasiak R, Pransky G, Verma S, Webster B.
    Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct 01; 28(19):2283-91. PubMed ID: 14520045.
    Abstract:
    STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of administrative claims data in a single workers' compensation jurisdiction. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of alternative definitions and follow-up parameters on rates of low back pain recurrence based on detailed administrative data. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous studies reported low back pain recurrence rates ranging from 14% to 45%, without consistency in definitions of recurrence or specifications of follow-up. METHODS: Patients with new claims for low back pain reported in New Hampshire to a large workers' compensation provider in 1996 and 1997 were selected (N = 2944). Definitions of recurrence included: new workers' compensation claim, new episode of care, and new episode of lost work time (work disability). For the latter two definitions, various minimum between-episode gaps were applied and related to recurrence rates. Two follow-up structures (constant length of follow-up post end of the first episode and fixed-period length of follow-up since the onset of low back pain) were examined for sensitivity of recognizing low back pain recurrence, with a maximum of 3-year follow-up. RESULTS: Recurrence rate using a claims-based definition was 7.9% and 7.1% for the entire cohort and the subset with work disability days, respectively, for the 3 years of follow-up. Care-based recurrence rates ranged between 12% and 49%, whereas disability-based recurrence rates ranged between 6% and 17% over the 3 years, inversely related to the length of the minimum between-episode gap (R = -0.86 for disability and care, P < 0.001). Two-year follow-up was sufficient to identify 85% to 100% of recurrences regardless of the follow-up structure. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrence rates are highly sensitive to variations in definitions. Consistency of definitions and application across studies is required to enable valid comparisons.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]