These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Reliability and general practice value of 2 rapid Streptococcus A tests].
    Author: Schmuziger N, Schneider S, Frei R.
    Journal: HNO; 2003 Oct; 51(10):806-12. PubMed ID: 14523534.
    Abstract:
    Rapid streptococcal-A-antigen detection assays have good specificity (over 90 percent) but moderate sensitivity (between 80 and 90 percent), when the tests are compared with a standard throat culture. Contradictory results have been found for one of the more recent tests, the optical immune assay Strep A OIA MAX, while for 6 years, we have been using the immune assay Strep A Plus. Results of the optical immunoassay and the conventional immune assay Strep A Plus were compared in 65 patients with acute pharyngitis. A standard culture was used as reference and confirmed by enhanced broth culturing and nucleic acid hybridization assay (Gen-Probe) when the two detection assays produced contradictory results. While both assays were equally sensitive (78.3%), Strep A OIA MAX and Strep A Plus had a similar specificity of 95.2% and 100%, respectively. Four and nine steps were required for Strep A Plus and for Strep A OIA MAX test procedures, respectively with results being available in 4-5 min and in 9-10 min, respectively. We conclude that both rapid immunoassays have a similar reliability while the handling of the Strep A Plus is much simpler than the handling of the Strep A OIA MAX. Neither rapid immunoassays are sensitive enough to eliminate the need for backup cultures.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]