These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Excellent durability of the Hancock porcine bioprosthesis in the tricuspid position. A sixteen-year follow-up study.
    Author: Kawachi Y, Tominaga R, Hisahara M, Nakashima A, Yasui H, Tokunaga K.
    Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1992 Dec; 104(6):1561-6. PubMed ID: 1453721.
    Abstract:
    From February 1975 to August 1981, 23 consecutive patients underwent tricuspid valve replacement, which was either isolated (six patients) or combined with the replacement of other valves (17) by means of a standard, glutaraldehyde-preserved Hancock porcine bioprostheses. Patients' ages ranged from 9 to 53 (mean 36.2) years. The follow-up period ranged from 0.2 to 16.5 years (mean 9.1) and was complete in 100% of all cases. Structural valve failure of the tricuspid Hancock valve was noticed in two patients, a 9-year-old boy and a 13-year-old girl 3.4 and 16.5 years after implantation, respectively. The actuarial freedom rate from structural valve failure at 10 years was 94 +/- 6%. There were six tricuspid prosthesis-related events: structural valve failure in two and valve thrombosis, anticoagulant-related bleeding, prosthetic valve endocarditis, and periprosthetic leak in one each, respectively. The actuarial freedom from these events at 10 years was 78 +/- 10%. Five pairs of aortic/mitral-tricuspid Hancock valves were explanted simultaneously from the same patients after 8.1 to 13.9 (mean 11.4) years postoperatively. A gross examination showed no valve dysfunction in the explants from the tricuspid position, but degenerative changes with valve dysfunction in those from the mitral and aortic position were observed (none of five versus five of seven; p < 0.03). We concluded that the selection of a Hancock bioprosthesis in the tricuspid position is acceptable because of the low incidence of prosthesis-related complications and the excellent durability of more than 10 years.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]