These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Validation of a German Version of the Fatigue Impact Scale FIS-D].
    Author: Häuser W, Almouhtasseb R, Muthny FA, Grandt D.
    Journal: Z Gastroenterol; 2003 Oct; 41(10):973-82. PubMed ID: 14562194.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: The Fatigue Impact Scale, FIS, is an internationally used instrument for the assessment of the impact of fatigue on Health-Related Quality of Life, HRQOL, also in patients with chronic liver diseases. In the German-speaking countries a validated instrument for measuring the impact of fatigue on patients with chronic liver diseases has not been available so far. METHODS: The German linguistic adaptation of the FIS using a forward-backward procedure was administered to 204 patients (age 52,7 +/- 13,9 years; 47 % female, 53 % male, 45 % no cirrhosis, 22 % Child's A, 15 % Child's B and 17 % Child's C cirrhosis; 53 % with chronic viral hepatitis, 32 % with alcoholic and 15 % with other liver diseases) of a secondary care hospital. The following internationally accepted instruments were used for validation: The Short Form Health Survey, SF 36, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale German Version, HADS-D, and the Giessener Symptom Scale, GBB 24. Fifty patients in clinically stable situation filled out the FIS-D within 3 - 8 days. RESULTS: The acceptance of the FIS-D was high with 98 % answered items. The internal consistency of the three subscales was excellent (0.94 - 0.96), the test-retest reliability of the three subscales was good (0.72 - 0.83). The correlation coefficients with the validation instruments ranged between 0.49 and 0.80 (all p < 0 001). No differences in the FIS-D subscale scores were found in patients with and without cirrhosis and between the different Child-Pugh stages of liver cirrhosis. Patients treated with tranquilizer or antidepressants scored higher in the FIS-D than patients without this treatment (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The FIS-D is well accepted by patients in clinical routine care and has been shown to have good acceptance and reliability in the assessment of fatigue in chronic liver patients.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]