These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Validity of the Titmus and Randot circles tasks in children with known binocular vision disorders.
    Author: Fawcett SL, Birch EE.
    Journal: J AAPOS; 2003 Oct; 7(5):333-8. PubMed ID: 14566315.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: The Titmus and Randot (version 2) circles tests contain monocular form cues that may enable patients with binocular vision disorders to pass without any measurable stereopsis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity of the Randot and Titmus circles tests for quantifying stereoacuity in children with known binocular vision disorders. METHODS: Participants included 170 consecutive children with diverse binocular sensory function ranging from fine to no measurable stereopsis. Stereoacuity was measured using the Randot circles, the Titmus circles, and the Randot Preschool Stereoacuity tests. RESULTS: Discrepancies between stereoacuity scores derived using either the Titmus or Randot circles tests and the Randot Preschool Stereoacuity test increased as a function of random-dot stereoacuity. Stereoacuity scores derived using the circles tests showed good agreement with random-dot stereoacuity when stereoacuity was 2.2 log seconds of arc (160 seconds of arc) or better, but they progressively overestimated stereoacuity for poorer random-dot stereoacuity scores. CONCLUSION: When measuring stereoacuity using either the Titmus or Randot circles tests in patients with known binocular vision disorders, stereoacuity scores > 2.2 log seconds of arc should be interpreted with caution because it is above this level of stereoacuity that the monocular form cues of each of the tests may invalidate the results.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]