These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of methods for the quantitative determination of phospholipids in lecithins and flour improvers.
    Author: Helmerich G, Koehler P.
    Journal: J Agric Food Chem; 2003 Nov 05; 51(23):6645-51. PubMed ID: 14582954.
    Abstract:
    Phospholipid classes were determined qualitatively and quantitatively in eight commercial lecithins and three flour improvers by thin-layer chromatography (TLC), high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and (31)P nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((31)P NMR). The total amounts of phospholipids as well as the amounts of phospholipid classes in the samples were comparable but depended on the method used for quantification. Highest selectivity was provided by (31)P NMR as all phospholipids and lysophospholipids could easily be quantified. By TLC only lysophosphatidylcholine could not be quantified, whereas HPLC was the method with the lowest selectivity, because lysophospholipids, except lysophosphatidylethanolamine, could not be determined. Sensitivity was best for HPLC and TLC with detection limits of 20-170 mug/mL. By means of (31)P NMR these figures increased by a factor of 10-70. The coefficients of variation were 5.5, 6.8, and 12.8% for quantification by TLC, HPLC, and (31)P NMR, respectively, showing that TLC was the method with the best reproducibility. Altogether, (31)P NMR can be recommended for the quantification of phospholipids, because it is easy to perform and results can be obtained quickly. As it requires minimum instrumental equipment, TLC is a good alternative to (31)P NMR. If high sensitivity is required, HPLC is the best method.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]