These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Prediction of the apnea-hypopnea index from overnight pulse oximetry.
    Author: Magalang UJ, Dmochowski J, Veeramachaneni S, Draw A, Mador MJ, El-Solh A, Grant BJ.
    Journal: Chest; 2003 Nov; 124(5):1694-701. PubMed ID: 14605037.
    Abstract:
    STUDY OBJECTIVE: s: To compare the relative usefulness of the different indexes derived from pulse oximetry in the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and to determine if a combination of these indexes improves the prediction of the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) measured by polysomnography. DESIGN: Prediction model developed from 224 patients, validated prospectively in 101 patients from the same center (group 1) and in 191 patients from a different sleep center (group 2). SETTING: Two independent sleep clinics run by university sleep specialists. PARTICIPANTS: Patients who underwent polysomnography for suspicion of OSA. INTERVENTIONS: The following indexes were calculated from pulse oximetry recordings performed simultaneously during polysomnography: (1) Delta index, the average of the absolute differences of oxygen saturation between successive 12-s intervals; (2) desaturation events per hour to 2%, 3%, and 4% levels; and (3) cumulative time spent below 90%, 88%, 86%, 84%, 82%, and 80% saturation. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The best predictor was the Delta index, although desaturation events provided similar levels of diagnostic accuracy. An aggregation of multivariate models using combination of indexes reduced the prediction error (r(2) = 0.70) significantly (p < 0.05) compared to using the Delta index alone (r(2) = 0.60). The proportion of subjects from the validation groups within 95% confidence interval (CI) of the derivation group was 90% (95% CI, 83 to 95%) and 91% (95% CI, 86 to 95%) for groups 1 and 2, respectively. The overall likelihood ratios for the aggregated model in all patient groups were 4.2 (95% CI, 3.3 to 15.3), 3.4 (95% CI, 2.7 to 4.3), 3.0 (95% CI, 2.2 to 4.1), and 6.7 (95% CI, 4.9 to 9.2) for normal (AHI < 5/h), mild (AHI 5 to < 15/h), moderate (AHI 15 to < 30/h), and severe (AHI > or = 30/h) disease, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Delta index and oxygen desaturation indexes provided similar levels of diagnostic accuracy. The combination of indexes improved the precision of the predicted AHI and may offer a potentially simpler alternative to polysomnography.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]