These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Bioassay screening of Amazonian plants.
    Author: Guerrero RO, Rivera SM, Rivera S, Sueiro LA.
    Journal: P R Health Sci J; 2003 Sep; 22(3):291-7. PubMed ID: 14619457.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate several biological activities of thirty plant extracts collected in the North West Amazon (Ecuador). Some of these plants are being used for their reputed medicinal properties by the natives of this region. METHODS: Five in vitro bioassays were used to screen the plant material. 1. The brine shrimp lethality examination (BSLT) in microplate is a general test that seems capable of detecting a broad spectrum of bioactivity present in crude plant extracts. 2. Free radical scavenging properties were studied in a colorimetric assay using 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH). 3. The beta-glucosidase inhibition test is thought to be a method for the evaluation of anti-AIDS, anti-diabetic or anti-obesity compounds. 4. The xanthine oxidase inhibition assay is used to identify potential anti-gout agents. 5. The antibacterial activity that is being used to isolate and identify antibiotic drugs. RESULTS: In the BSLT, we found that Piscidia carthagenensis demonstrated very good activity with a LC50: 21.81 micrograms/mL. It is considered that plant extracts with low LC50 values may contain metabolites with cytotoxic, antifungal, insecticidal or pesticide activities. In the antioxidant activity bioassay, several plant extracts were confirmed to have excellent free radical scavenging properties. Rhus juglandifolia and Clusia venusta leaves exhibited an ED50: 3.12 micrograms/mL and 3.61 micrograms/mL, respectively. Piper reticulatum (84%), Inga heteroptera (77%), Clusia venusta (70.9%), and Rhus juglandifolia (70.5%) showed fairly good inhibition activity for beta-glucosidase. On the other hand, none of the plant extracts was capable of inhibiting xanthine oxidase. Finally, the Gram-positive microorganisms Staphylococcus aureus and Corynebacterium diphteriae were found to be sensitive to the majority of the plant extracts, whereas the Gram-negative bacteria Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Proteus vulgaris, and Salmonella typhi were proved to be resistant toward the plant extracts. CONCLUSIONS: It is important to continue investigating our plant kingdom, especially the world tropical reserves as an alternative for finding new or better drugs. It should be essential to follow-up this type of investigation to isolate and elucidate the active principles of the bio-positive plants.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]