These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Phenotypic differences between esophageal and gastric intestinal metaplasia. Author: Piazuelo MB, Haque S, Delgado A, Du JX, Rodriguez F, Correa P. Journal: Mod Pathol; 2004 Jan; 17(1):62-74. PubMed ID: 14631367. Abstract: Intestinal metaplasia is a cancer precursor in the esophagus and the stomach. Marked differences exist between the carcinogenic processes in the two locations in terms of natural history and clinical significance. We investigated biopsies from 52 patients with Barrett's esophagus and from 50 patients with gastric intestinal metaplasia in an attempt to throw light on their pathogenic processes. Morphologic characteristics, presence of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), and markers of differentiation, inflammation, and proliferation were evaluated by histochemical and immunohistochemical techniques. The area covered by incomplete type of intestinal metaplasia and the proportion of sulfomucins were significantly higher in the esophagus than in the stomach. Immunoreactivity with MUC1, MUC2, MUC5AC, Das-1, cytokeratins 7 and 20, inducible nitric oxide synthase and cyclooxygenase-2 antibodies was also significantly greater in Barrett's esophagus than in gastric intestinal metaplasia. In gastric intestinal metaplasia, the presence of MUC1, MUC5AC, Das-1 and cytokeratin 7 was restricted to areas with the incomplete type of metaplasia. Cell proliferation (Ki-67) was significantly higher in Barrett's esophagus than in gastric intestinal metaplasia. H. pylori was absent in all of the patients with Barrett's esophagus, while it was present in 70% of the patients with gastric intestinal metaplasia. Our observations made clear that Barrett's esophagus shares some phenotypic characteristics with gastric intestinal metaplasia, leading us to suggest that both could arise in response to injuries with eventual carcinogenic potential. However, the progression to more advanced lesions could be modulated by the nature of the carcinogenic insult.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]